Loading…
AI
Claude
“The AI you can actually think with, not just generate.”
From €0/monthTry Claude
Quick summary
Ideal forDevelopers, entrepreneurs and creators who want a thinking assistant, not just a generator
Use caseAnalysis, writing, code, brainstorming, reading long documents
StrengthDeep reasoning over long contexts, no aggressive hallucinations
WeaknessNo real-time internet access, knowledge cut off at a limit date
Claude is the most useful AI for serious work. It nuances, questions, and says when it doesn't know, which is rare.
Pros & cons
Pros
- 200,000-token context window: loads an entire codebase or a book
- Projects: persistent memory and shared files per project (e.g. one project = one SaaS)
- Nuanced reasoning: says "I'm not certain" instead of confabulating
- Artifacts: generates and displays code, HTML, React, SVG in a dedicated panel
- Excellent understanding of French and Creole
Cons
- No real-time internet access (unlike Perplexity or ChatGPT with browsing)
- The message limit on the Pro plan can be reached during intense sessions
- No cross-project memory without manual setup
Pricing
Free
€0/month
- Access to Claude Sonnet
- Daily-limited conversations
- File analysis
- Artifacts (code, visualizations)
- Daily message limit
- No Projects
- No API access
Discovery and occasional use
Recommended
Pro
€18/month
- Claude Opus (the most powerful model)
- 5× more messages than the Free plan
- Projects (persistent memory per project)
- Priority access during peak times
- Preview of new features
Professionals who use AI daily
Max (5×)
€90/month
- Everything in Pro +
- 5× more messages than Pro
- Extended Claude Code access
- Maximum priority on the servers
Power users: code with Claude every day, write a lot
Direct API
Variable/month
- Pay as you go
- $3/million tokens (Sonnet)
- No monthly cap
- Custom integration (n8n, scripts, SaaS)
Developers who integrate Claude into their apps
Why Claude is in my stack
Before
ChatGPT for everything reflection, writing, brainstorming and research. And Copilot in IntelliJ for inline autocompletion. Two subscriptions, two separate contexts.
The problem
On the real in-depth questions (architecture, auditing a whole module, an article draft) ChatGPT stayed on the surface or made things up. Too much confabulation on details I couldn't check quickly, and a context window too short to digest a long document.
Why this tool won
Claude holds 200k tokens without losing the thread, and above all says "I'm not sure" instead of inventing. It is a thinking partner, not a generating machine. And the tone is more nuanced, which helps me write in my own voice.
Concrete result
~80% of my thinking hours (SaaS architecture, product brainstorming, writing) go through Claude. ChatGPT and Copilot left my stack the same week, replaced by Claude and Claude Code respectively.
How I use it day to day
Case #1 · SaaS architecture
Context When I design the structure of a new SaaS or a major feature.
How I describe the product context and the constraints (stack, deadline, users) and ask Claude to challenge the approach. No direct generation: sparring.
Result I leave sessions with 2-3 angles I hadn't seen, and often a technical debt avoided.
Case #2 · Long-form writing
Context To structure an article or a newsletter issue before writing.
How I paste a raw draft + scattered notes into a Project. I ask for an outline, then we iterate sentence by sentence.
Result A 1500-word article goes from 4h to ~1h30, without losing my voice.
Case #3 · Code audit & PR review
Context Before merging a PR or to understand legacy code.
How I paste the full diff (up to several thousand lines) and ask for the likely bugs, regressions and questions to ask the author.
Result I catch edge cases that CI doesn't see. My reviews are deeper in half the time.
Case #4 · Reading long documents
Context When I have to digest technical docs, a contract, or a dataset.
How Upload the PDF into a Project, then a conversation to extract the key points and test my understanding with questions.
Result No linear reading of 80 pages: straight to the 5 decisions that matter.
Comparison with the alternatives
Each alternative has its own page. See all comparisons.
ChatGPT (GPT-4o)
Better at:Internet access (Browsing), built-in DALL-E, many plugins, brand recognition
Worse at:Shallower reasoning on complex tasks, more hallucinations
ChatGPT if you need web access or images. Claude for any serious cognitive work.
Gemini (Google)
Better at:Google Workspace integration, access to Google Search, multimodal
Worse at:Less precise reasoning, less reliable for complex code
Gemini for Google workflows. Claude for everything else.
Compatibility
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude safe for sensitive data?
Anthropic does not reuse conversations for training if you are on the Pro plan. For truly sensitive data, use the API with a DPA agreement.
What is the difference between Claude Free and Pro?
The Free plan is limited in the number of messages per day and does not include Claude Opus. Pro gives 5× more messages, Projects (memory), and access to the Opus model.
Final verdict
Value for money: Excellent
“My main assistant since 2024. Nothing beats it for analyzing a complex problem or revising a text in depth.”
I recommend it toDevelopers and entrepreneurs who want an AI to think, analyze and write seriously.
Not suited forUse cases that need real-time web access or image generation.